Stopping Rule Experiment
A two-condition demonstrator for examining whether metacognitive questioning changes when a judgement is closed, kept open, or reopened as evidence evolves.
JavaScript is not running. This simulator must be embedded as an iframe pointing to the standalone HTML file; pasting the complete HTML directly into a WordPress page may cause WordPress or a security policy to remove the script.
Cases
Experimental conditions
A — Unaided reasoning No metacognitive intervention.
B — Metacognitive support Triggered prompts challenge closure, confidence or under-specified reasoning.
Closure timing
Reopening
Confidence shift
Information seeking
WordPress iframe-compatible build. Responses remain only for the current session. Prototype only; not a validated competence or clinical assessment instrument.
Within-case comparison
Restart this case
Clear current responses
Clinical concept, model and design: Michael Tremblay.